OUR SERVICES

DEBT COLLECTION

A company’s credit management is one of the essential elements of a successful commercial activity. It is therefore crucial for creditors to obtain the right advice at the right time in order to protect debts due to them.
The number of court cases dealing with debt collection has diminished drastically over the years as the use of judicial letters proved to be incredibly useful in the saving of both time and money. In fact, when the debt is decisive and clear, the creditor may make claims for amounts not exceeding €23,300 as per Article 166A of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure. Otherwise, Article 253 allows judicial letters to be filed for unlimited outstanding debts. Court cases before the Superior Courts may be instituted where the amounts due vary and are not liquidated.
At Mifsud & Mifsud Advocates we have the necessary expertise to assist companies with their individual needs in relation to debt collection. The firm can assist from pre-litigation stage up to the execution of a judgment. Moreover, the firm is affiliated to a number of international debt collection companies through which it can assist local companies in chasing debts on an international level.

OUR LAWYERS SPECIALISING IN THIS FIELD

Malcolm Mifsud

Founding Partner

Gianluca Cappitta

Partner

Ian Barbara

Associate

MEET OUR TEAM

Get to know us
OUR TEAM

LATEST INSIGHTS

Civil LawProperty Law
March 28, 2025

When the wording of a contract is clear there is no need for any other interpretation

The parties of a contract should enter into that contract in good faith and thus the execution of that contract should be in terms of…
Civil LawProcedural Law
March 22, 2025

When there is no defence, the plaintiff still has to prove the case

When the defendant fails to file a statement of defence, this does not mean they are admitting to the claims of the plaintiff. This was…
Administrative LawConstitutional Law
March 13, 2025

Court rules pensioner should receive an increase in pension

The Court of Appeal in its deliberations held that the fact that the Appellant retired in 2015, before the Legal Notice became enforceable, is irrelevant.…