Thursday, December 14, 2017
In Mark Muscat -v- HSBC Bank Malta plc, the First Hall of the Civil Courts held that when one alleges discrimination, then one must prove that there is a difference in how one is treated in the same or similar circumstances. This was held in a judgement delivered on 5 December 2015 by Mr Justice Silvio Meli.
Sunday, December 10, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court referred a case to the Rent Regulation Board after it decided that it was not competent to hear cases concerning rent issues even if the lease was terminated. This was a judgement delivered on 30 November 2017 by Madame Justice Lorraine Schembri Orland in Joseph Sammut v Liliana Jalil.
Friday, December 01, 2017
The Court awarded the full parental authority to a mother after it was shown that the father was disinterested in his child. This took place in a judgement delivered by Madame Justice Abigail Lofaro on 21 November 2017 in LB -v- Dr Christopher Chircop and PL L Tifigno for and on behalf of absent ADS.
Tuesday, November 21, 2017
Malta offers a wide range of schemes and programmes to those individuals opting to establish their permanent residence in its jurisdiction. The High Net Worth Individual Scheme, introduced in 2011, proved to be particularly attractive for those seeking to benefit from a special tax status in a country which suits their standard of living.
Friday, November 17, 2017
A party of a lawsuit cannot be declared in default and therefore, not replying to the action, if the time period within which he has to reply has not run out. This was held in a judgement delivered by Mr Justice Robert Mangion in a family law dispute named AB -v- CB. The judgement was given on 31 October 2017.
Friday, November 10, 2017
If two parties are making claims on the same property, the plaintiff may be allowed to show the Court that he has a better title than that of the defendant. This was held by Mr Justice Azzopardi in a judgement delivered in Joseph Camilleri and Michael Camilleri v John Mary Deguara decided on 27 October 2017.
Friday, November 03, 2017
This was held in a judgement delivered by Mr Justice Silvio Meli on 24 October 2017 in Vincent Arnaud v Salvina Abela. In his application Arnaud explained that his mother lived in a property in Valletta and he was given the key. However, when his mother died, his sister Salvina Abela changed the locks, not allowing him to enter. He asked the Court to order the defendant to allow him access and to allow him to change the lock.
Friday, October 27, 2017
This was held in GO plc v Margaret Camilleri, decided on 12th October, 2017, presided by Dr Anna Mallia. In the application, GO plc asked the Court to order the defendant, Margaret Camilleri to pay €700.30 for services provided. Camilleri replied to this claim that she had on a number of occasions informed the company that the service was not required any longer and asked for it to be disconnected.
Sunday, October 22, 2017
Mifsud & Mifsud Advocates together with Aegies Corporate Services teamed up to celebrate National Breast Cancer Awareness Month this October. In order to raise further awareness, all the team members decided to wear pink on the day.
Friday, October 20, 2017
This was held in a judgement delivered by Ms Justice Anna Felice on 10 October, 2017 in Arnold Joseph Grech and Doris Grech -v- Jimfard Company Limited, Muscat and Gatt Construction Limited and GAM Limited.
Friday, October 13, 2017
This was decided and delivered by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti on 3 October, 2017, in Malta Towage Limited -v- Director of Fisheries. In the plaintiff company’s application, the company explained that it owns a vessel, the MV Ernest E. Pierce, which had a fishing licence which was valid from 15 May, 2015, to 4 May, 2016. On 15 June, 2015 the Director of Fisheries suspended the licence, because according to the defendant, the vessel was fishing beyond 12 nautical miles without the necessary authorisation and also it was alleged that the captain was not registered and licensed.
Monday, October 09, 2017
Outdated rent laws continue to disadvantage the property owners caught up in decades-old contracts – but, today, something can be done to challenge them. Jo Caruana talks to lawyers Malcolm and Cedric Mifsud, of Mifsud & Mifsud Advocates, to discover what landlords can hope to achieve.
Friday, October 06, 2017
The Court of Appeal, presided by Mr Justice Anthony Ellul, ruled that an agreement of payment should be honoured, even if the services rendered were not totally satisfactory. The judgement was delivered on 22 September, 2017 in Chris Tonna v James Borg and Stefan Borg.
Friday, September 29, 2017
When a tenant fails to perform maintenance, which leads to serious damage to the rented property, then the tenant may be evicted from that property. This was held by Magistrate Josette Demicoli, who presided the Rent Regulation Board sitting in Joseph and Frances Barbara -v- Maria Concetta Mifsud. The judgement was delivered on 15 September, 2017.
Friday, September 22, 2017
Magistrate’s Court held that it is not sufficient for harassment to stick if there is only one incident, there must be more than one. This was held in a court judgement, the Police -v- Tristan Tedesco, handed down by Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimech on 8 August, 2017.
Thursday, September 14, 2017
The Magistrates Court in its criminal jurisdiction held that when a youth is being sentenced, the court must be careful to not criminalise that youth. This was decided by Magistrate Dr Joesph Mifsud in the police -v- Omissis (name not being published) decided on 2 September, 2017
Friday, September 08, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court turned down a request to issue a warrant of prohibitory injunction to block an eviction, when the court marshals had already changed the locks and deposited the keys in court. This was decided by Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff in Cecil Herbet Jones -v- Charles and Mares Dolores Grech on 29 August, 2017.
Friday, September 01, 2017
A Magistrate’s Court upheld an application for a warrant of prohibitory injunction, even though the applicant had a special hypothec in his favour. This was decided by Magistrate Charmaine Galea on 21 August, 2017 in San Lawrenz Leisure Resort Limited and San Lawrenz Operators Limited -v- Waldemar Woyseth von Turow and his wife Halina Dunin-Woyseth von Turow.
Friday, August 25, 2017
The Magistrates Court upheld a plea of prescription because the buyer of a car found out the defect well before the action was instituted. This was a judgement delivered by Magistrate Dr Consuelo Scerri Herrera on 5 July, 2017 in Carmelo Cassar -v- Mario Zammit in his name and on behalf of Mario Auto Dealer.
Friday, August 18, 2017
A judgment is not null and void if the Court fails to mention all the articles of law in its conclusion, but are mentioned in other parts of the judgment. This was decided by Chief Justice Silvio Camilleri in the police -v- John Vella on 3 August, 2017.
Friday, August 11, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court on 2 August, 2017 ruled that if a garnishee order is filed according to law, then it should not be revoked. This was decided by Ms Justice Anna Felice in St George Edition Limited -v- Apassionata World GmbH, represented in Malta by Dr Adrian Camilleri.
Friday, August 04, 2017
In the case where a plaintiff is seeking payment and the defendant alleges that the debt has been paid, the defendant must prove the payment. This was decided by Magistrate Dr Gabrielle Vella in Blue Media Marketing Limited -v- Anton sive Claude Camilleri on 26 July, 2017.
Friday, July 28, 2017
A person who is being charged with a crime committed when holding a position in a company, must have this indicated in the charges brought again that person. This was held in a judgement handed down by Magistrate Joseph Mifsud on 5 July, 2017, in The Police -v- Anthony Zammit and Michael Zammit.
Friday, July 21, 2017
The Administrative Review Tribunal turned down a plea from the Ministry of Education that judicial acts should be filed before actions are filed with the Tribunal. This was decided on 6 July, 2017 by Magistrate Charmaine Galea, Dr David Fabri and Dr Antoine Naudi in Vincent Carabott -v- Ministry of Education and the Teachers Professional Council.
Friday, July 14, 2017
A magistrate’s court held on 27th June, 2017 that a statement given to the police which was not corroborated by any other evidence in court was tantamount to hearsay evidence. This was held in a criminal court case Police vs Caruso Massimo and Pace Emmanuel presided by Magistrate Consuelo Scerri Herrera.
Friday, July 07, 2017
When the Maltese Parliament transposes a Directive in the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (Regulation) Act, its application must be in conformity with the Maltese law. This was held by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti on 26 June, 2017 in Dr Luigi Sansone as special mandatory of United States Polo Association -v- Corporate Trading Limited.
Tuesday, July 04, 2017
Immigration and citizenship have evolved in Malta since it became independent in 1964. The Maltese government throughout the years has introduced various schemes on immigration with the main aim of attracting investment or high net worth individuals to Malta. More often than not the purchase or renting of property have been included in these schemes to give an obvious boost to the construction industry in Malta. In 2014 a new scheme was introduced for the acquisition of citizenship, the Individual Investor Programme (IIP), which has undergone a rough passage into Maltese legislation; however, today it enjoys the approval of the European Commission.
Friday, June 30, 2017
Appeals of Small Claims Tribunal are limited to points of law. This was held by the Court of Appeal on 16 June, 2017 in Fogg Insurance Agencies Ltd noe v Local Council, Luqa et. In their application, Fogg Insurance had filed an action against the local council claiming payment of €491.76 following damages sustained by a vehicle due to a pothole. The council contested the claim and argued that the accident took place in a road which is the responsibility of Transport Malta.
Friday, June 23, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Courts, in its constitutional jurisdiction, held that the legislation concerning workers handling asbestos was not sufficient to protect them and as a result was a breach to their right to life. This was decided on 14 June, 2017 in Maria Rosaria Fenech v Principal Medical Government Officer and the Attorney General.
Friday, June 16, 2017
A court turned down an action which was instituted after a 20-day period stipulated by Article 466 of the Code of Organisation and Civil Procedure. This was decided by Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff in ARMS Limited -v- Uddin Hallim on 2 June, 2017.
Thursday, June 15, 2017
Dr Malcolm Mifsud, co-founding partner of Mifsud & Mifsud Advocates, was elected a board member of World Link for Law in New York. WLL is a leading network of international law firms, comprising teams of international lawyers. Established as Euro-Link for Lawyers in the 1980s, it now has a network of 70 law firms with 80 offices in 47 countries.
Friday, June 09, 2017
The fact that one gas distributor also filled the gas cylinders of competitors caused confusion to consumers and therefore constituted unfair competition. This was decided by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti in a judgement in Liquigas Malta Limited -v- William Mifsud, Jason Mifsud and Easygas Malta Limited.
Friday, June 02, 2017
It is not sufficient for a witness to simply testify on a document if it is not produced in court. This was held by the First Hall of the Civil Courts in Farsons Beverage Imports Company Limited -v- Marco Aquilina, Cocktails Limited and Carisma Limited, by Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff on 22 May, 2017.
Friday, May 26, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court ruled that for prescription to be interrupted a defendant must be notified of the judicial act, which must not simply be filed in court. This was held in a judgment handed down on 16 May, 2017 by Mr Justice Joseph R. Micallef in a case Inna Said -v- Massimo Bonello, Alberto Sammut and Motor Insurance Pool.
Friday, May 19, 2017
Employers are bound to ensure safety on the workplace, the Court of Appeal said in its recent judgement of 28 April, 2017 in the names Joseph Seychell et v. the Commander of the Armed Forces of Malta. The accident which gave rise to this case happened on 2 April, 2003.
Friday, May 12, 2017
The act of a widow taking over the lease of a butcher shop does not constitute a sublease. This was decided by Magistrate Joanne Vella Cuschieri on 2 May, 2017 in Victoria Attard -v- Giorgia Mercieca and Angela Mercieca.
Friday, May 05, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court decided on 26 April, 2017 that any property used under or above an immovable property belongs to the owner. The judgment was delivered by Mr Justice Joseph Azzopardi in John Cachia and his wife Maria Cachia v Emmdor Limited, Emmanuel Vassallo and Mary Vassallo.
Friday, April 28, 2017
Services rendered to an aunt by her niece are to be compensated for, even if small amounts of payment were already made by the latter to cover certain expenses. This was decided by Judge Joseph R. Micallef on the 11th April 2017 in Mary Briffa vs. Consiglia Abdilla.
Wednesday, April 26, 2017
Considering the publication on 11/03/2017 of French Decree 2017-307 of 09/03/2017, here are a few points for which Malta can be a solution to the issues raised by that Decree. In short, the French Decree imposes the affiliation to the French social security system, ONLY for French resident (not nationals) crewmembers working on yachts not covered by EU legislation or an international social security agreement.
Friday, April 21, 2017
The Maltese Court may have jurisdiction to hear and decide cases where the parties have signed a contract which indicates another country to have judicial jurisdiction.
Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Dr Malcolm Mifsud, has been elected on the Financial Services Executive Committee of the Chamber of Commerce, Enterprise and Industry. This committee is an influential body within the Chamber of Commerce that assist companies and other entities that work in the financial services sector to share ideas on how the financial services industry in Malta can continue to grow and is an important lobby with the Government.
Friday, April 14, 2017
Works carried by one of two warring bar owners constituted spoliation of the other bar owner. This was decided by Magistrate Joanne Vella Cuschieri on 4 April 2017 in Kenneth Grech v Pubblius Buttigieg. In his application, Kenneth Grech told the Court that he runs Royal Lady Bar in Mgarr and the defendant runs the bar next door to him. Grech accused Buttigieg of placing concrete on the pavement in front of his car. Grech held that this constitutes spoliation.
Friday, April 07, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court held that joint liability of two debtors has to be proved and not presumed. This was one of the points of law which was decided upon in a judgement delivered by Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff, in Bonavia Properties Limited -v- Maria Helga Muscat Groelz and Raymond Abela.
Friday, March 31, 2017
The Court of Appeal on 21 March 2017 held that an email message saying that the debtor will process a payment is sufficient to interrupt prescription. This was held in a judgment in MM Workshop Ltd v Civil Protection Department delivered by Mr. Justice Anthony Ellul.
Friday, March 24, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court in its judgement (application number 1057/2013) of 14 March, 2017 held that it was not the competent Court to revoke a 1981 adoption. This was held in a court case presided by Mr Justice Silvio Meli, between a son and his natural and adoptive parents and the Director of Public Registry.
Friday, March 17, 2017
On the 16th February, 2017, Mr Justice Joseph R. Micallef in Lidl Immobiliare Malta Limited vs. Mifsud et noe held that the changes in the traffic system carried out by the council of Sta Venera were not ultra vires, despite complaints raised by the establishment of Lidl Immobiliare Malta Limited.
Friday, March 10, 2017
This was held by Ms Justice Lorraine Schembri Orland presiding at the First Hall Civil Court in the judgement Paul Farrugia et v. Gordon Calleja decided on 28 February 2017. This case was filed by Paul and Maria Lourdes spouses Farrugia against Gordon Calleja who owns the property situated adjacent to their garden. Mr Calleja had extended his property by building a room on his airspace and installed a window in the corner of one of the walls of this room which directly overlooked the property of spouses Farrugia.
Friday, March 03, 2017
An application for a retrial was turned down because the applicant failed to prove that he was not notified of proceedings. This was decided by Magistrate Gabriella Vella in Angelo Aquilina -v- Eurofreight Services Limited on 20 February, 2017.
Friday, February 24, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court ruled that for two competing identical trademarks to be confusing they must feature predominantly and the plaintiff must prove that the use of the two will cause confusion. This was decided on 14 February, 2017 by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti in Y Plan Events Ltd v Wow Ltd, Andrew Selvagi v Martina Selvagi
Friday, February 17, 2017
On the 7th February 2017, Magistrate Joanne Vella Cuschieri in the case Camilleri vs. Azzopardi et held that a co-owner possessing property adjacent to the land commonly owned with other parties, may demand such part of the latter property as is adjacent to the property already owned by him upon division of the property between them.
Friday, February 10, 2017
The Court of Magistrates (Malta) as a Court of Criminal Judicature in a judgement delivered by Magistrate Dr. Joseph Mifsud on the 1st February 2017 in the names Pulizija v. Giovanni Francesco Selvaggi analysed the elements which need to subsist in order for a person to be found guilty of the offence of judicial perjury
Friday, February 03, 2017
The Administrative Review Tribunal decided that decisions on applications for mini-van licences must be notified to the applicants and not sent to their lawyer. This was held in Josef Borg v Awtorita’ ghat-Trasport f’Malta on 23 January, 2014, presided by Magistrate Charmaine Galea.
Friday, January 27, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court is competent to decide on all civil matters that are raised before it, unless expressly excluded by law. This was held by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti on 16 January, 2017 in Emanuel and Carmen Falzon v Rita Dalmas.
Friday, January 20, 2017
The First Hall of the Civil Court held that the tenant of any rented property has a legal obligation to take care of that property, as a father takes care of his family, and is to pay for all damages caused. This was decided by Ms Justice Anna Felice on 10 January, 2017 in Eman Pace -v- Daham Al Hamad.
Friday, January 13, 2017
A Court presided by Magistrate Marse-Ann Farrugia held that the defects found in a second-hand car must have been known to the buyer when he bought the car and as a result the sale was valid. This was decided on 14 December, 2016 in Emanuel Cassar -v- Stephen Farrugia.
Friday, January 06, 2017
The Court of Appeal held that from the evidence produced and the agreements signed, a former shareholder had correctly paid a bank loan, although he believed he should not have. This was decided by Mr Justice Anthony Ellul in Patrick Cutajar -v- Mario Vella on 16 December, 2016.
Friday, December 30, 2016
Qualification from a foreign university must match the local and EU regulations for one to be granted a professional warrant. This was explained in a judgement delivered on 16 December, 2016 by the Administrative Review Tribunal presided by Magistrate Dr Charmaine Galea, and Engineers Raymond Vassallo and Norman Zammit in a case Alfred Buttigieg -v- Professional Engineers Board.
Friday, December 23, 2016
An insurance company may only claim against a policy holder for damages it paid out if the policy holder is in breach of its insurance policy. This was held by the Court of Appeal, presided by Mr Justice Anthony Ellul, on 14 December, 2016 in Gasan Mamo Insurance Limited -v- Pierre Carabott and Gilmore Cachia.
Friday, December 16, 2016
A Court held in a judgement that in order for someone to claim a right of property, there must be strong evidence to back the claim. This was decided in a judgement handed down on 7 December, 2016, in Lawrence and Maria Dolores Gauci -v- the Director General of Lands and the Commissioner of Lands and the Joint Office.
Friday, December 02, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court decided that once parties to a legal action have concluded their differences in a contract, the court case can become futile. This was decided by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti in Bernardette Licari -v- Carmel Attard, Joy Attard and Benjamin Rizzo as liquidator of Denelir Properties Limited on 21 November, 2016.
Friday, November 25, 2016
The Magistrates Court in its Superior Jurisdiction in Gozo ruled that a damages case relating to the construction of a cemetery is Nadur, should have been filed against the parish and not against the parish priest. This was decided by Magistrate Joanne Cuschieri on 15 November, 2016 in Martin Camilleri et -v- Rev Archpriest Jimmy Xerri and Victor Guzman.
Friday, November 18, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court held that the plaintiff in a damages lawsuit must prove that the defendant is legally responsible for the accident that occurred. This was held in Louis and Maryanne Bonavia v John Bonello, Nicola Gambino and Atlas Insurance PCC Ltd, decided on 8 November, 2016 by Mr Justice Silvio Meli.
Friday, November 11, 2016
The Court of Appeal ruled that a contractor must be paid for extra works carried out. This was held on 31 October, 2016 in Saviour Camilleri v Joseph Falzon et.
Friday, November 04, 2016
Mr Justice Joseph R. Micallef in the case Steel Projects Limited - vs - Avantgarde Projects Limited, found on October 25, 2016, the defendant liable to pay the sum of €71,521.70 to the plaintiff. This was due to the latter for works sub-contracted to it by the defendant company.
Friday, October 28, 2016
When a court stays the proceedings of a case, this must be done for very good reasons, because a case should start and end. This was decided on 19 October, 2016 in Carmelo Stivala Group Limited -v- Maria Carmela sive Marlene Borg et.
Friday, October 21, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court accepted a plea by a defendant company to allow into suit the previous owners of a property, because they could have an interest in the action. This was decided in a judgment delivered on 10 October, 2016, by Ms Justice Anna Felice in a case Joseph Zammit and his wife Jeanette Zammit Gia Caruana -v- Central Mediterranean Development Corporation Limited.
Friday, October 14, 2016
A full and final settlement may not necessarily be so and depends on the circumstances of the case. This was decided by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti in Maria Stella Calleja -v- Brian Degiorgio on 5 October, 2016.
Friday, October 07, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court held in its judgement of 26 September, 2016, in Marica Mizzi -v- Dr Joseph Muscat, Prime Minister, and Mario Cutajar, Principal Permanent Secretary within the Office of the Prime Minister, that where a contract is clear, it need not be interpreted.
Friday, September 30, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court upheld a warrant of prohibitory injunction requested by one company against another, since it proved that it had all the legal requisites to block the transfer of a pharmacy licence it was to purchase. This was decided in Labomed Limited -v- Superintendent of Public Health on 15 September, 2016 by Mr Justice Silvio Meli.
Friday, September 16, 2016
In a bid to protect a minority shareholder, the First Hall of the Civil Courts ordered that a new director be appointed on the board of directors. This was decided in Av. Jonathan Abela Fiorentino as special mandatory of Marsoft International AS -v- Vroon Containers BV and Balticmax Holding Company Limited on 2 September 2016 by Mr Justice Joseph Zammit McKeon.
Friday, September 09, 2016
The Court of Appeal in its Inferior Jurisdiction on 29 July, 2016 overturned a decision of the Small Claims Tribunal in the case Baldacchino et noe vs Ellul. In the appeal judgement the latter was ordered to pay the sum due to Baldacchino Aluminium Works for works carried out in his place, despite claims that the works were not carried out in terms of the required skill, art and profession.
Friday, September 02, 2016
Mr Justice Joseph R. Micallef in his judgment Spillane – vs – Gatt of 4th August, 2016, found the defendant responsible for paying damages together with the difference in price of the total amount paid by Spillane for an apartment. This is because the apartment sold by Gatt to Spillane suffered from latent defects at the time when the contract was concluded.
Wednesday, August 24, 2016
The Magistrates Court, presided by Magistrate Dr Joseph Mifsud, explained in his judgement delivered on 17 August 2016 in Il-Pulizija v Eebis Getu, that the charges of a false criminal report and calumnious accusations may be factually similar, however, from a legal point of view they are two separate and distinct charges.
Friday, August 19, 2016
A Court in a judgment delivered on 15th July, 2016, agreed with the judgment of the Court of Magistrates delivered on 18th June, 2014, in which it ordered Mary Gauci to pay the sum of €10,699.09 for promotional services carried out by Media Today Co. Ltd, despite claims that she was merely acting on behalf of and in representation of another company, Libertas Malta.
Monday, August 15, 2016
The Magistrates Court in Gozo found Victor Camilleri guilty of fraud, misappropriation and falsification after it analysed in details the elements of each of the charges brought against him. Magistrate Dr Joseph Mifsud delivered his judgement on 21 July 2016 in Pulizija v Victor Camilleri.
Friday, July 29, 2016
The Court held that no new evidence can be produced at the submissions stage of a lawsuit. This was pointed out in a judgement delivered by Mr Justice Joseph Zammit McKeon in Martin Cassano -v- Alessandro sive Sandro Cassano on 14 July 2016.
Friday, July 22, 2016
On 27 May, 2016, the Court of Appeal confirmed the decision of the First Hall Civil Court in Granata -vs- Commissioner of Lands. The Court held that the plaintiff did not have a right to an action of spoliation in this particular case, although the locks of the boathouse, which she used to enjoy on lease, were removed and changed against the plaintiff’s will, depriving her of its possession and enjoyment.
Friday, July 15, 2016
The Rent Regulated Board presided by Magistrate Dr Monica Vella held that a property which is complimentary to the principle place of business cannot be deemed to be not in use. This was held in Adelaide Ellul et –v- Alfred and Josephine Cassar on 16 June 2016.
Saturday, July 09, 2016
The Constitutional Court composed on the Chief Justice, Silvio Camilleri and the Justices Giannino Caruana Demajo and Noel Cuschieri turned down an appeal from a partial judgement since it was filed beyond the obligatory 20 days. This was held in on 27 May 2016 Dr Cedric Mifsud and Dr Michael Camilleri as special mandatories of Nazzareno Bezzina, Joseph Bezzina, Catherine Avero, George Bezzina, Angelo Bezzina heirs of the Bartolomeo and Giuseppa Bezzina –v- Andrew and Theresa sive Azzopardi.
Friday, July 08, 2016
In Mary Buttigieg et -vs- John Polidano et delivered on 27 May, 2016, the Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the First Hall of the Civil Court and held that when damages are caused to an adjacent tenement due to demolition works, then the contractor, the architect and the owner of the tenement in which works are being carried out are to be held jointly and severally liable.
Friday, June 24, 2016
A Magistrate’s Court in Gozo allowed that a child’s surname be changed in order to reflect those of the parents. In was decided in Yunis Alex Tramboo and his wife Christabel Tramboo Galea -v- Director of Public Registry in Gozo by Magistrate Joanne Vella Cuschieri on 14 June, 2016.
Friday, June 17, 2016
A Court revoked an enforcement decree after it was discovered that the decree was issued before the subject of the decree was notified correctly. This was decided in a judgement delivered by Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff on 6 June, 2016 in Ricky Alan Reeves -v- Inland Revenue Commissioner.
Thursday, June 02, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Hall did not allow plaintiffs to act as administrators of a vacant inheritance, since they did not follow the correct procedure laid down in the law. This was held in a judgement delivered on 25 May 2016 by Mr Justice Joseph Azzopardi in Paul Vella bhala Kuratur tal-eredita gjacenti ta’ Maria Calleja l-Avukt Dottor Karmenu Mifsud Bonnici bhala amministratur tal-eredita ta’ Tommaso u Concetta Cilia -v- Beatrice Cantania, Anton Cantania u Andre Catania.
Thursday, May 26, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court in its Constitutional jurisdiction turned down a plea that the applicant should first exhaust all its remedies before going before the constitutional court, since the complaint is 50 years old. This was held in Philip Cauchi, Joseph Cauchi, Margaret Gatt, Mary Frendo, Mary Rose Bugeja, Oreste Cauchi, Doris Caruana f’isimha propju u bhala prokuratrici ta’ l-assenti. Maria armla ta’ Filippu Cilia u Kummissarju ta’ l-Artijiet decided on 17 May 2016.
Thursday, May 19, 2016
The Magistrates’ Court held in a criminal case that for harassment to succeed the prosecution have to prove that the victim has to suffer more than one incident from the same perpetrators. This was decided on 9 May 2016 by Magistrate Natasha Galea Sciberras in a case against two youths, whose names have been banned. They were both charged with harassing and attacking another youth and causing damages to a car.
Thursday, April 07, 2016
Etiam id velit vitae erat efficitur pellentesque nec quis justo. Nunc ut tortor malesuada quam suscipit dictum eu a ligula. Sed ac pretium tellus...
Thursday, March 31, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court on 22 March, 2016 in John sive Juanito Pullicino –v- Carm Lino Scerri, laid down that a co-owner may force another co-owner to pay his share of work in a property owned jointly, as long as these works are urgent and necessary.
Monday, March 28, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Court on 15 March 2016, delivered a judgement in Paul Lungaro -v- Salvino Lungaro. Mr Justice Lawrence Mintoff held that if a co-owner of a business excludes another, then that co-owner is liable for damages. In his writ of summons presented on 6 October, 1995, Paul Lungaro explained that the defendant is his brother. His father, who operated the hospital canteen at St Luke Hospital, died without a will in January, 1969. Upon their father’s death, the operation of the canteen was taken over by the defendant and another brother, Anthony. The lease of the canteen was held by the mother, who died in May 1986.
Thursday, March 17, 2016
The Magistrates’ Court in Gozo, presided by Magistrate Dr Joanne Vella Cuschieri in Kenneth Cutajar -v- brothers Lawrence Attard, Joseph Attard, Mariano Attard and George Attard, and siblings Joseph Sultana, Rose Sultana and Gilbert Sultana, held that the court was unable to accept the claim that spoliation took place, because the person who carried out this spoliation could not be identified
Thursday, March 10, 2016
A government department’s decision not to divulge information to persons being investigated is not sufficient to justify a judicial review by the court. A court may delve into a government department’s decision and not into preparatory measures. This was decided on 2 March, 2016 by Mr Justice Mark Chetcuti in John Grech and his wife Maria Carmela Grech –v- the Commissioner of Inland Revenue.
Thursday, March 03, 2016
The First Hall of the Civil Courts held in its judgement of 24 February, 2016 in Gordon and Charlene Farrugia –v- Aldo Farrugia, that if one is to interpret a contract one sees the wording of that contract and not other evidence that may be produced.
Thursday, February 25, 2016
If a plaintiff is unsuccessful in proving a ground invoked in liquidation proceedings, the court cannot presume that there are other grounds. This was decided in a judgement delivered by Mr Justice Joseph Zammit McKeon on 16 February, 2016 in The Catering Centre Limited -v- Entertainment Limited.
Friday, October 09, 2015
The Court of Appeal presided by Mr Justice Anthony Ellul held that the appeal lodged against an arbitration award was null and void as the grounds of appeal were not points f law. This was decided on 17 June 2016 in Euroshops Limited u Maurice Gruppetta –v- Attard & Co (Industrial) Limited.
Monday, January 06, 2014
Mr Justice Lino Farrugia Sacco on 16 December 2013 decided in the lawsuit between Patricia Degiorgio –v- Ramel u Zrar Limited that a promise of sale agreement may not be enforceable if one or more of the conditions listed in the agreement cannot be met.
© MIFSUD MIFSUD. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
ALL ARTICLES - SITEMAP - Terms of Use - Privacy Policy
website by